![]() |
| Sydney CBD across the harbour. GX85 with Lumix 12-60mm at 60mm. |
Panasonic’s
M43 product development
people have in recent times been throwing off models like a hyperactive Catherine Wheel.
The original G-without-another-letter
(Just-G) and GH series have more or less stayed with the hump-top-with-handle style, notwithstanding a minor deviation for
the G3 which had a mini handle for no reason apparent to me.
Then they introduced the GF and GM series of tiny tots
which appeared to be showing off just how small a MILC can be, although the
purpose of such a demonstration has always eluded me.
If I want
really small, the Sony RX100(4) does a much better job of
a) being small and
b) taking pictures.
The common theme of the GX series is that all models
to date have been flat tops.
First there was the GX1 of 2011, with no built in EVF,
a nasty little problem with shutter shock and no E-Shutter to smooth things
out.
Then in 2013 came the GX7.
How did we get from GX1 straight to GX7 ? Beats me. However the GX7 did have an inbuilt
EVF, it had a good sensor and it did
have E-Shutter which fixed the shutter shock problem and still gave 12 bits per
channel RAW files. I had one for a while and sold it on as I did not like the
ergonomics.
However some users do like the way the G7 handles and operates.
In 2015 the GX8 arrived.
How did we get from the slim compact GX7 to the big
bulky GX8 ? One can but wonder. Apart
from the flat top there is little evidence of thematic consistency here.
And now we have the GX80/85 which Panasonic assures us
is the real successor to the GX7 and just to add to the confusion is apparently
sold as the GX7 Mk2 in Japan.
Notwithstanding all the product development muddle at
Panasonic the GX80/85 turns out to be one of the most appealing M43 models yet
produced due to some new technologies.
The three new technologies of most interest to me are:
1. A new electro magnetic (EM) focal plane shutter
mechanism. Why is this important ?
The bugbear of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras
(including M43 models) since their
introduction in 2008 has been Shutter Shock a problem which I have discussed at length on
this blog.
Panasonic G, GX and GH cameras up to the GX80 all use
a spring loaded shutter mechanism which produces sufficient perturbation as it
fires to cause image degradation with some lenses at some shutter speeds,
typically in the 1/100-1/160 second range.
The GF and GM models use a version of the EM shutter
incorporating electronic first curtain. This appears to eliminate shutter shock
but has a slow flash synch speed of 1/50 second and a slow top speed of only
1/500 second.
E-Shutter has its own problems and limitations as does
Electronic First Curtain.
On my tests using the Panasonic 12-60mm, 12-32mm and
25mm f1.7 lenses the GX80 shutter appears to cause no sign of image degradation
due to shutter shock at any shutter speed.
The new shutter is clearly more gentle and controlled
in action than the old spring loaded one.
Panasonic claims a 90% reduction in the amplitude of
the shock wave and based on my observations
I am inclined to believe this.
The old shutter fires with a loud click-e-ty-clack sound
and an easily felt shockwave passing through the camera body and lens.
The new EM shutter makes a softer did-el-y-plop sound with
a much less palpable shock wave.
The result is a mechanical shutter which can be used without
restriction at all shutter speeds from 60 seconds to 1/4000 second.
At last we have a ‘set and forget’ solution to the
shutter shock problem.
For this reason alone I currently recommend the
GX80/85 over all other M43 cameras.
The final solution is, of course, the much anticipated
global (electronic) shutter but it seems we must wait awhile longer for this to
appear on consumer still cameras.
2. No optical low pass filter. Digital sensors are prone to a phenomenon
called ‘moire’ in which subjects with closely spaced regular features such as
threads in clothing or parallel lines are rendered falsely with various drawing
and color artefacts. The solution to
this for many years has been a special filter (OLPF) in front of the sensor. This
works but reduces resolution.
By removing the OLPF Panasonic claims an “almost 10% improvement in resolution” over 16
Mpx cameras with OLPF. Moire and associated artefacts will, we are told, be
managed in the image processing software.
Does it work ?
On my tests, yes I would say it does. On close examination of subjects likely to
produce moire I see no more evidence of this in images from the GX80 than
cameras with an OLPF.
The GX8 has a 20mpx sensor giving a horizontal
resolution of 5184 pixels. This is 13% more than the 16 Mpx GX80 which has 4592
horizontal pixels.
So in effect the GX80 can deliver linear resolution almost
equal to that of the GX8 which has 20 Mpx with an OLPF.
3. 5 axis In
Body Image Stabiliser (IBIS) with Dual IS.
Image stabiliser technology is
one of the wonders of modern photography. It enables sharp hand held photos at
much slower shutter speeds than would be possible without IS.
Traditionally Olympus has had IBIS, Panasonic has
relied on an Optical Image Stabiliser module in the lens.
But many lenses, especially primes, do not have OIS,
so Panasonic users have been calling for IBIS for several years.
This first appeared in the GX7, then we saw an
improved four axis version in the GX8 and now the GX80/85 has the latest 5 axis
version. Even better, the GX80 enables
Dual IS with lens OIS (if available) and body IBIS working together. The notion
of two separate IS modules wobbling simultaneously in response to camera
movement sounds so improbable as to seem almost miraculous. But to my considerable amazement, it works
and delivers consistently sharp pictures in the process.
Videographers will be pleased that the GX85 offers
Dual IS with 4K video, which the G8 does not.
Other
features The GX85 is
jam packed with a multitude of features, functions and capabilities which you
can read about elsewhere.
Summary
Since 2008 Panasonic has released 24 Micro Four Thirds
camera models and Olympus 19, for a total of 43.
I rate the GX80/85 as the most appealing M43 model yet
produced for still photographers because of the new EM shutter which appears to
have eliminated image degradation due to shutter shock. Note, this is yet to be confirmed with some
key lenses such as the Lumix 14-140mm.
I find it ironic that Panasonic which never openly
admitted that shutter shock was (and still is with most models) a problem now
proudly announces a workable, set-and-forget solution.
I will detail my observations about picture quality,
performance and ergonomics in posts coming soon, but in very brief summary
Picture quality is very good
Performance is very good
Ergonomics are acceptable with a less than optimal
holding and viewing experience.

Will you be trying it with the 14-140? That's the lens I would want to use on it.
ReplyDeleteHi Andrew,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Mark Jones, I work for a creative agency in the UK currently conducting some research into camera design. Judging by the wealth of information on your blog, it would be very valuable for us to have a chance to chat with you. I was wondering whether you might be interested and available for a skype call? If so, do let me know, you can reach me on mark@forpeople.co.uk
Thank you for building and sharing such a great resource on camera ergonomics, it's a fantastic resource!
Best Regards,
Mark