![]() |
Grevillea buxifolia hand held RF 100mm f2.8 L Macro |
Released in 2021, The Canon RF 100mm f2.8 L Macro is one of the best lenses I have ever owned.
It renders superbly sharp images across the frame and into the corners right
from f2.8, with barely any evidence of distortion or aberrations. In addition
it features super fast, accurate autofocus making it suitable for sports,
action and even birds in flight.
I have read or viewed 13 reviews of this lens in addition to
my own reviews on this blog. Most express fulsome praise for the lens with few
if any downsides.
But two reviewers have reported focus shift.
To explain: Canon
lenses focus with the aperture wide open for optimal speed and accuracy then
close down to the selected aperture for the exposure. This means the designers
need to make sure the plane of best sharpness does not shift as the aperture is
closed down.
Two of the reviewers to date have reported some kind of
focus shift.
The first is Bryan Carnathan of The Digital Picture (website)
who reported focus shift at high magnification levels. I note however that at
least as reported, his testing procedure appears to have been more naturalistic
than systematic.
The second is Dustin Abbott of his eponymous Youtube
channel. Mr Abbott reported some unexpected variation in sharpness at the
center of a test chart at normal distance and attributed this to focus shift.
However he did not report systematically testing for focus shift using a
bespoke method like the one which I use as described below.
I tested for distribution of the zone of sharpest focus
using my usual method which you can read about here.
I wish more lens testers would use this method as it can
quickly reveal much useful information about what happens to the three
dimensional distribution of sharpness as the aperture is closed down. There are
many important characteristics of a lens which cannot be revealed by
photographing flat test charts.
I find the RF 100mm f2.8 L Macro gives
an exemplary performance on this test. Sharpness is distributed evenly
across the frame with no detectable shift as the aperture is altered.
To test for focus shift at macro distances, I made up the little test rig you can see in the photo.
I align the lens axis perpendicular to the target face of
the test subject and level both test rig and camera from side to side. I
photograph the target at f2.8, f4 …etc
up to f32.
I did not detect any evidence of focus shift on this test.
![]() |
Focus shift test jig for close-up distances |
Summary and Conclusion
I set up test protocols specifically designed to detect the
presence of focus shift both at normal distances and macro (close-up)
distances.
I found no evidence of focus shift.
The characteristic movement of the zone of best sharpness of
a lens with aperture change (and focus distance change and with zooms focal
length change) is baked into the design of a lens as are things like distortion
and peripheral shading.
I think it unlikely therefore that sample variation could
account for significant differences in results from independent reviewers. Any
difference seen is more likely to be due to variations in test procedure.



Nice Click gimbal prices in pakistan
ReplyDelete