![]() |
| This is from the RAW file worked in Adobe Camera Raw and converted to a JPG for publication. |
| This is the JPG straight out of the camera. |
Conventional
digital camera wisdom says that small sensor cameras have
poor dynamic range. This means they struggle to render detail in highlights and
shadows when subject brightness range is high.
DXO Mark reports that the FZ300/330 has an overall RAW
score of 38 and a DR score of 11.0.
These results might tempt a prospective FZ300 buyer
into thinking that the camera would be of little use when subject brightness
range is high.
So I put it to the test with many difficult subjects.
Here are some pictures which illustrate the camera’s
capability.
For all but the most extreme situations the camera
manages just fine as long as RAW capture is used and the full range of options
in a good RAW converter are utilised. I use Adobe Camera Raw and Photoshop.
Of course this illustrates the paradox of the small
sensor cameras.
This is that the people most likely to use such
cameras are snapshooters who leave the Mode Dial on the [iA] setting and always
shoot JPG.
But the users most likely to get the best results are
the enthusiast/experts who capture RAW and process thoughtfully in a RAW
converter/image editor.
See the difference in the pictures above and below:
| This is the original JPG straight out of camera. |
Here is one from the rainforest
| This is the out of camera JPG |



I don't have the FZ300, but judging from both my GX7 and GX8, Panasonic has also other automatic ways to reduce highlights and increase shadows (curves?)
ReplyDeleteYes, iDynamic for JPG. This works but a better result is possible when starting from a RAW file.
DeleteAndrew