For many years through the 20th Century the industry rolled along happily making minor incremental improvements to the familiar theme of manual focus film cameras.
The first big challenge was autofocus. The first
commercially successful interchangeable lens camera with autofocus was the
Minolta A7000 of 1985. Sony bought Minolta, kept and improved on their AF
technology then scrapped the Minolta brand.
Pentax was late to the AF party, lost market share and never
recovered. They also got lost on the way to the MILC party which has left them
still making DSLRs for their dwindling but apparently not yet extinct cohort of
loyal buyers. I used Pentax SLR cameras in the 1970s and 1980s but switched to
a Canon EOS 630 in 1989 for the autofocus.
This technology challenge is still playing out with some
makers like Panasonic putting resources into multiple models of dubious
relevance while persevering with DFD contrast detect AF when they really should
have invested more in matching Sony’s high performance phase detect AF. Now
they are paying the price with cameras which are still not able to match AF
performance with Sony, Canon or Nikon.
The next big challenge was digital image capture which
replaced film with a light sensitive electronic sensor module. Surprising as it
might seem this challenge proved easier to navigate than some others . Single
lens reflex (SLR) cameras could retain most of their architecture and autofocus
function during the transition process. The SLR became the DSLR, and onwards
marched the caravan of progress.
A much larger speed bump came in the form of the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC), a technology first seen in the Panasonic Lumix G1 of 2008, closely followed by the Olympus Pen E-P1 of 2009. These cameras introduced the then revolutionary Micro Four Thirds (MFT) camera system which produced cameras and lenses which were much more compact than the mainstream DSLRs of the time.
Unfortunately for Panasonic and Olympus their excellent new
MFT adventure launched into the 2008 global financial crisis which did them no
favours at all.
In addition their choice of the 21.5mm diagonal MFT system,
which has a sensor with about a quarter the area of a standard 24x36mm full
frame sensor, has not managed to attract enough buyers to become a mainstream
format. Among the Mirrorless interchangeable lens formats the already popular
APSC sensor size has continued to attract most buyers.
Technically the Leica Messsucher (M) series cameras have
utilised a mirrorless interchangeable lens configuration since the M3 of 1954.
But Leica M cameras have never been a mainstream consumer product and they have
not used through-the -lens viewing until the recently announced M-EV1.
The MILC concept has such obvious advantages for compact
packaging, reduced manufacturing cost and AF accuracy, that all the camera
makers who were going to survive and prosper scrambled to develop their own
version of this technology.
However it meant a total, clean sheet, re-design of the
entire imaging, exposure metering, viewing and focussing system. This took
several years and even now in 2025 Canon, Nikon and Pentax still sell DSLR
cameras although in declining numbers.
In 1995 total world wide camera sales amounted to about 5 million units. Inexpensive, compact digital models with built-in lens boosted the popularity of cameras enormously. The apogee of sales came in 2010 when around 122 million units were sold worldwide, most of them being compact and bridge types with a built in zoom lens.
Then came smartphones with one or more built-in camera
modules and the compact digital camera was relegated to niche within a niche
status. Total camera sales crashed from 122 million in 2010 to just 8 million
in 2023 and about 8.8 million in 2024. Most of the loss was from cameras with
built-in lens. Interchangeable lens
models remained fairly steady from 2020 at around 6.5 million units per year
after an initial fall.
In 2024 about 1.23 billion smart phones were sold worldwide,
making them the overwhelming favourite picture taking device for family, travel
and snapshot use cases.
Nevertheless, most camera makers have survived by investing
in technological advances to their interchangeable lens models and shifting
from a high volume, low unit profit model to a low volume, high unit profit
model. Chinese buyers have been especially instrumental in holding up sales of
interchangeable lens cameras and lenses. In 2025, 31% of global interchangeable
lens camera shipments went to China, compared to North America (27%) and Europe
(21%).
In 2024 and 2025 an interesting counter current developed.
Most camera makers have almost completely abandoned cameras with a built-in
lens but some buyers have shown a return of interest in compact digital
cameras. This interest appears to cover the full price range from Veblen goods
like the Leica Q series through enthusiast models like the Fujifilm X100 series
and the Ricoh GR series. There also appears to be a resurgence of interest in
el cheapo models from China with various well known brand names like Kodak and
Yashica. Some of these are junk cameras also known as scamras which make
terrible pictures but apparently people buy them anyway. The miniature Kodak
Charmera appears to be a runaway sales success.
Some pre-owned compacts with built-in lens and some very
small MFT models are selling on the used market well above new prices.
Chris Niccolls of Petapixel announced, tongue-in-cheek, in
June 2025 that the Panasonic lumix GM5, introduced in 2015 is the “Greatest
digital camera ever made”. Of course it is not, but he is making a good point
which is that camera makers have abandoned compact, high quality cameras like
the GM5 and have failed to update more recent ones like the Pana-Lumix G100 and
G100D when there is a cohort of photographers who would be very keen to buy
something like this.
The page view count on this blog (Camera Ergonomics) has for
most of its 15 year existence had posts about fixed lens compact and bridge
cameras at the top of the list every day. The feedback which I receive
indicates there is still plenty of interest in cameras of this type.
I think the next challenge is partly a consequence of the industry’s response to the smartphone onslaught. Camera makers have pushed many of their products so far upmarket that they greatly exceed the requirements of all but the most demanding professional sports and wildlife photographers and some dedicated amateurs who want to win major international awards.
Will substantial numbers of camera buyers continue to purchase
expensive camera gear the capability of which exceeds their requirements ?
Maybe they will, in which case the camera industry will
continue making and selling increasingly amazing gear which can fire off single
images at 40 frames per second and 8K video, neither of which anybody actually
needs.
But if a lot of consumers decide that much less expensive
gear can easily meet their requirements, the camera industry could have another
big challenge on its hands. Entry level cameras generate minimal profit per
unit. If Canon buyers decide the R10 is
good enough for their purposes and the R5 and R6 line are surplus to requirements,
then Canon will have to raise prices on entry level units and/or generate new
market categories with opportunities for higher per unit profit margins.
Fujifilm appears to have managed this with their X100 series
as has Ricoh with the GR series.
As they say, prediction is difficult, especially about the
future, so I have to confess having no firm ideas as to how the camera industry will tackle this
latest challenge. But I am reasonably confident that they will have to do
something or watch as their business model drifts away from their customer’s actual
requirements.
One thing I would like to see is renewed interest in
enthusiast level compact and bridge cameras with built-in lens. Proper, fully
featured models ready for demanding assignments, not just also-rans playing
second fiddle to interchangeable lens models.
I live in hope………….




No comments:
Post a Comment