In my previous post I asked…If the Lumix new L10 is the answer, what is the question ?
Having thought about this for a few days I have some ideas about the matter.
I have no inside information at all. I am just an ordinary retail consumer. However there is plenty of evidence available in the public domain that Panasonic Holdings and the Imaging Solutions Business Division, which is responsible for the Lumix brand, are facing serious challenges to their viability.
According to the Google AI, Lumix held a global all models share of the camera market amounting to about 8% from 2001-2010. This fell to around 6% between 2011 and 2020, despite of or maybe because of Lumix introduction together with Olympus, of the all-new Micro Four Thirds system. From 2020 to 2025 Lumix market share has fallen further to around 3.5%.
Lumix currently offers several types of digital camera. There are full frame hybrid and video-centric models and the Micro Four thirds GH line of specialist video models. I think these models will succeed or fail on the merits which they already bring to the market place.
Then we have compacts and consumer oriented Micro Four Thirds models.
In an interview with journalists a few years ago, Fujifilm executives revealed that their Camera division was rescued from possible failure by just one model, the X100 and its subsequent iterations.
I think we can entertain the proposition that the task of the new L10 in the Lumix catalogue is to rescue their compact and consumer MFT operation.
Taking the lead from Fujifilm, the marketing pitch for the new L10 rests heavily on its appeal to buyers seeking a product with beauty and style. Oh… yes… it also takes pictures….
When we look at the L10 we can see it incorporates some very deliberate styling features.
The L10 has a (mostly) flat top, squared-off style, with a minimal handle and thumb support. The front handle does not reach upwards onto the brightwork which extends in a continuous line across the top and bottom of the body. Apparently this is the height of camera fashion at the present time. I am unmoved by a camera’s styling but it appears plenty of buyers are very exercised by it.
It seems to me that as the flag-bearer of a market share rescue mission, the L10 has three problems.
1. The ergonomics of the thing are compromised.
Specifically I see four issues each of which could be rectified without compromise to the styling.
The first is the handle which can in fact already be upgraded. This is by fitting the SmallRig color matched accessory grip which adds depth and height to the handle for a more secure hold on the camera together with an inbuilt Arca-Swiss type tripod plate while retaining access to the battery and memory card.
Next, I see no way to add a soft rubber eyecup to the EVF housing. Current model Sony flat top MILCs have a groove on the top and sides of the hard part of the EVF eyepiece to allow such a soft eyecup to be fitted. My considerable experience with cameras like this is that especially in bright and/or back lighting conditions that soft eyepiece extension is very desirable for keeping out stray light. Lumix could fix this easily in production.
The L10 has no thumbstick. I regard this as inexcusable for an expensive camera model in 2026. Even my Canon EOS R10 at half the price of the L10 has a nicely located thumbstick with good haptics.
Looking at the back of the camera, I see they could easily put a thumbstick right where the [LUT] button now sits. I don’t think we need a LUT button at all but if the Lumix people think it desirable it could go between the [LVF] button and [Still/Video] lever.
The L10 has twin control dials but the secondary one is co-located on the back of the control panel with the cross keys. This ergonomic kludge has blighted millions of Canon Powershot and other models including some Lumix for years. It is convenient for the camera maker because it locates a dial and 5 buttons all in one compact space. But it is not user friendly as every time we turn the dial, we are likely to inadvertently press one of the buttons of the 4-way control set. This is a classic example of sub-optimal and entirely un-necessary design. Lumix could easily fix this without altering the styling at all. They could locate the front control dial around the shutter button, as is common and effective practice on many Lumix and OM system models. There is plenty of space for this. Zoom control can be achieved with a 360 degree knurled ring around the lens barrel as is the usual practice on MILCs. On the specific lens barrel used for the L10 the aperture lugs are redundant as we now have a mode dial and aperture can be changed with the control dial.
2. The cropped sensor concept might or might not have seemed like a good idea in 2014 but in 2026 it definitely is not. The LX100 and D-Lux models and now the L10 all use only 19.2mm of the 21.6mm diagonal of the four thirds sensor. If we are talking about a fixed, zoom lens compact, a lens which covers the whole of the sensor will be the same size as the one on the LX10 but the aperture range will be f2.8-4 or thereabouts instead of f1.7-2.8. I have been using the Lumix G100D and Canon R10 each with a small aperture kit zoom indoors, outdoors and everywhere else for several years with no problems at all. We no longer need to compromise other aspects of camera performance in the quest for a small f-stop number.
The multi-aspect ratio feature is completely redundant. The actual method of making the aspect ratio setting on the LX100, DL and L10 models is by a fiddly little slider on top of the lens barrel. A much more user friendly approach is to capture the whole of the frame and crop later if desired. Lumix seems to acknowledge this as the aspect ratio numerals have been removed from the slider which is now able to be used for other purposes if desired.
3. The L10 is not a Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lens camera. It is a fixed zoom lens compact camera. But that same body with minor alterations as described above, could also be used for a new Micro Four Thirds line of models, or even just one model as long as it has the GH7 sensor with Phase Detect AF and IBIS. There are plenty of MFT lenses already available for such a camera. If Lumix wants to remain in the consumer MFT market they desperately need a new model with greater appeal to photography enthusiasts than the old, boring, out-of-date models currently available.
Summary
If the new Lumix L10 is the flag-bearer of a mission to rescue Lumix fortunes in the compact and consumer MFT market then I think it might succeed if the designers make some changes to improve functionality and capability without changing the styling and in addition deliver a Micro Four Thirds version based on the same body.
No comments:
Post a Comment