![]() |
Canon EOS R10 at ISO 12800 with Adobe Denoise AI |
I posted a full user review of the R10 in December 2023. Youcan read it here.
In the days of single lens reflex SLR) and digital single lens reflex cameras (DSLR)
cameras, a fixed lens compact could be significantly smaller than most
interchangeable lens models.
But now we have mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras
(MILC) which are inherently smaller than their SLR predecessors. It is possible
to make these cameras so small that
their handling, ergonomics and physical user interface are all compromised to
the detriment of the user experience.
By way of example, in 2014 Panasonic released the Lumix GM5,
a micro four thirds interchangeable lens model which was substantially smaller
than the fixed lens Fuji X-100T of the same year. I owned a GM5 for a while but
the controls were cramped and operation was always a fiddly affair which I
never enjoyed.
Camera buyers discovered that their user experience was much
more agreeable with moderately larger units which are still compact but have
sufficient surface area to allow designers to include a decent handle and a set
of ergonomically positioned controls to satisfy an enthusiast photographer.
In this size range a well designed MILC can play the compact
camera role very well.
I have used and tested some small mirrorless interchangeable
lens models as compact cameras. These have included the Canon EOS R10 and R50,
Panasonic Lumix G100D, Nikon Z50 and Sony a6500, each with the basic kit lens
which comes in the box.
Some lens test afficionados and user forum members are
inclined to dismiss these basic little zooms as not worthy of an enthusiast
photographer’s attention.
But having tested and used them extensively I find the Canon
RF-S 18-45mm f4.5-6.7, Nikon DX 16-50mm f3.5-6.3 and Lumix G Vario 12-35mm f3.5-5.6 kit zooms
to be very good at all focal lengths and capable of delivering excellent image
quality.
Unfortunately the same cannot be said of the Sony E 16-50mm
f3.5-5.6 PZ kit zoom which first appeared in 2012 and earned a reputation for
poor quality control and variable sharpness. A minor update in 2024 uses the
same optical formula.
Almost any camera or smartphone these days can make very
good pictures so the one I settle on is that which provides me with the best
user experience.
![]() |
R10 in hand |
And that, in June 2025 is the Canon EOS R10. This is something of a Goldilocks model: not too large, not too small.
My hands are about
average size for an adult male. The R10 is the only model of those mentioned
above on which I can just get a full
five finger grip on the handle. Those with smaller hands will easily fit their
little finger on the lower part of the handle.
The R10 also has a well designed mode dial plus twin control
dial layout and a thumb operated joystick. All the controls are well located
and have good haptics.
When out and about making photos I can control aperture,
shutter speed, ISO setting, exposure compensation and AF area position with just the thumb and
index finger of my right hand, while looking continuously through the
viewfinder, without having to move the other fingers of my right hand or the
left hand.
The camera with lens mounted, spare battery and memory cards,
microfiber cloth and some lens wipe tissues all fit nicely in a Think Tank
Mirrorless mover 10 bag.
Some photographers prefer the more traditional style of
control layout using separate dials or rings for aperture, shutter speed, ISO
setting and exposure compensation with a separate means of directing the
position of the AF area.
This works well enough especially if we prefer a contemplative
approach to the process of camera work.
But this system does require more actions each more complex (involving
more fingers and both hands and taking the camera down from the eye).
Each unto his or her own.
![]() |
Add an accessory handle to one of the X-100 iterations and they are about the same size |
The EOS R10 kit offers several advantages over currently popular fixed lens compacts intended mainly for still photos.
The Fujifilm X100-6 is often kitted out by owners with an
accessory handle and thumb rest. The lens will not take a filter or lens hood
directly so an adapter must be fitted. By the time these accessories have been added there is not
much difference between the R10 and X100-6 in dimensions. And the R10 kit has the
advantage of a zoom lens and better
ergonomics.
The Ricoh GR 3/3X are interesting and extremely compact
models with very good image quality. But
the screen is fixed and there is no option to fit an EVF. I found this camera
unusable in sunlight.
On the specifications the Leica DL8 looks attractive with
its zoom lens and compact dimensions. But I found the autofocus unreliable in
some situations and the overall user experience less satisfying than the R10 or
the Lumix G100D with the same sensor, EVF and screen.
The wider aperture of the fixed lenses in the compacts is not
the advantage it once was. I can now use ISO 12800 on the R10 and produce a low
noise output with Adobe Denoise AI in Photoshop.
The R10 kit is not pocketable but in my experience many
pockets are hazardous places for a camera as they often contain all kinds of
dirt, dust, lint and other stuff which cameras do not like.



Thanks for your effort publishing your thoughts and findings on this site. It's very interesting to me that your views often mirror my own, in a world where many photography enthusiasts have very diverse needs and wants. I don't denigrate others for their disparate viewpoints, and I realize that there is room for all of us in the photo making arena.
ReplyDeleteI have recently sold my loved and excellent Canon R6 and R7 along with quite a few lenses just because I want that Goldilock experience. I wanted smaller and lighter....but not too small. I also love cameras that include IBIS and ariticulating rear screens. I settled on an Olympus E-M5 III and a Panasonic G85. Both of those are very satisfying to me in terms of size and weight. The Olympus might be a little too small, but the G85 is about perfect in that regard. I may upgrade to a G95 or G97 just to get the newer sensor those provide.
I would love to have a Canon R10 that included IBIS, and it would be nice if they could fit a larger EVF. I love Canon ergonomics, menus, and image quality. All of these camera models I've mentioned provide image quality that suits me fine. I do love the smaller lenses of m43 and I like the ability to use those lenses on both my chosen cameras. The fact that the lenses are mature in terms of production allows me to enjoy lower prices in the used market which has been very satisfactory to me for many years.